Abstract:

Four Years Reports of “Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association” during 2001 to 2005 were evaluated by 18 Editorial Board of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. We investigated the articles to specific fields and rejection rate etc. by different section chiefs. Although several problems concerning review time duration and rejection guideline issues indicated but generally all reviewer processes proved relatively clear and concise criteria. Through these objective and systematic evaluation processes, “Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association” will develop a good journal.